Got it!
Regards,
Kashyap
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:46 AM Alexander Burger
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:16:31AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote:
> > If I understand correctly - the filter clause is redundant because it
> does
> > not subset the records generated by the generator?
>
> Yes. In
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:16:31AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote:
> If I understand correctly - the filter clause is redundant because it does
> not subset the records generated by the generator?
Yes. In this simple case, where we have only a single generator, this is
correct.
You don't need 'select'
Thanks Alex ... I think I am getting there :) - It's pretty neat the more I
get into it!
If I understand correctly - the filter clause is redundant because it does
not subset the records generated by the generator?
When I look at the filter used in app/gui.l I wonder if the filter
(range @Nr @@
Hi Kashyap,
> : (? (select (@Tel) ( (mob +CuSu "37 176 86303") ) ))
> @Tel={C1}
> ...
> : (? (select (@Tel) ( (mob +CuSu "37 176 86303" tel +CuSu "37 176 86303") )
> ))
> -> NIL
>
> The first query returned as expected. The second one I believe means - look
> for "37 176 86303" either in tel
Hi,
I tried the following
: (? (select (@Tel) ( (mob +CuSu "37 176 86303") ) ))
@Tel={C1}
-> NIL
: (? (select (@Tel) ( (mob +CuSu "37 176 86303" tel +CuSu "37 176 86303") )
))
-> NIL
The first query returned as expected. The second one I believe means - look
for "37 176 86303" either in
