Hi Tomas,
> what is the best way to write the cls macro in the following example?
I think your solution is very good!
The problem is that there are no evaluating version of the functions
'class' and 'dm'. That's why you have to resort to a macro in the first
place. And a macro is always an infer
Hi Mansur,
please excuse me, but I would like to ask you again to translate some
new strings in "app/loc/ru" ;-)
As you may have noticed, Tomas triggered me to implement a few 'check>'
methods in "app/er.l", and have it called in "app/ord.l". Such checks
naturally generate error messages.
Besid
