Hello all!
As I like to do something useful when I learn a new language, I decided to do a
backup system.
I obviously chose to use the integrated database engine to store the meta-data.
Unfortunately, the timings I get are starting to frighten me:
# Backup returns the number of +File insertions
Hi Laurent,
> As I like to do something useful when I learn a new language, I
> decided to do a backup system.
OK.
> As you can see, given the progression, it will soon take more time
> to store the meta-data than processing the data itself.
> Does anybody see if I made a mistake in my code?
Ye
Le 31/07/2012 18:53, Alexander Burger a écrit :
It causes each time a +File is created to be the list of files
in the +Backup object to be extended:
(de addFile (Bk P)
...
(put!>
o
'backups
(append (; 'o backups) Bk) )
Thus, the single +Backup object gets
Hmm, thinking about it, I see that I wrote nonsense:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:53:57PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> However, I suspect that 'request' is not needed here at all, as you
> create new +File objects. So 'new' is the way:
In fact, I suspect that you of course want to reuse the fil
Hi Laurent,
ha, our mails just crossed their ways :)
> What I intended for was to have an immediate list of the +Files for
> any +Backup, and to be able to know if any +File had no +Backup
> anymore for cleanup.
> I guess I'll have to query the database for all the +File linking to
> a given +Bac
