Christophe Gragnic
writes:
Hi Christophe,
> This thread is meant to collect ideas about PilMCU.
> At least mine (because I need to clean them up a bit)
> and ideas of other PicoLispers (out of curiosity).
>
> Maybe some items will look more like questions like «is it even possible?»!
that last
Great to read on pilmcu and other updates!
On October 8, 2014 at 8:23 AM Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> But I feel that it doesn't make sense except for miniPicoLisp. By doing
> so, you save a few hundred kilobytes in RAM at most, but get the
> disadvantages of a less flexible runtime environment.
I would want to use pilmcu for realtime applications,
with no ram cache, just RAM. It would be really easy to allocate
time slots and calculate an upper bound for how long a function
could run.
--jakob
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Jakob,
> > So I have no plan at the moment to do that.
>
> But if the need would arise, it would not be exactly hard to implement?
That's right. I'd gladly do it if somebody pays me for a couple of days
.. ;-)
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
