Re: toy-forth-in-picolisp, and a 32-bit problem

Thanks, Alex! I’ll give it a try a little later, but I’m sure it works. /Jon > On 26. aug. 2016, at 18.23, Alexander Burger wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: >> Must be my fault. I never had the idea to 'prinl' an anonymous

Re: toy-forth-in-picolisp, and a 32-bit problem

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 05:55:45PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote: > As I wrote before, it didnt crash always > > http://pastebin.com/JkVkBjbQ > ... > http://pastebin.com/mTj51y4B I can't produce a crash here :( Perhaps you can 'trace' to locate the exact place? At the end of "forth.l" put

Re: toy-forth-in-picolisp, and a 32-bit problem

> > crashes? What is in the temp stack? Perhaps it is the fixed prin/prinl > issue of anonymous symbols. > > ​tempStack is list, look how it prints when not crashed​ http://pastebin.com/mTj51y4B

Re: toy-forth-in-picolisp, and a 32-bit problem

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:56:55PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote: > > > > crashes? What is in the temp stack? Perhaps it is the fixed prin/prinl > > issue of anonymous symbols. > > > > > ​tempStack is list, look how it prints when not crashed​ > > http://pastebin.com/mTj51y4B Yes, anonymous symbols.

Re: toy-forth-in-picolisp, and a 32-bit problem

> Perhaps you can 'trace' to locate the exact place? > > http://pastebin.com/kb6DGxpN

Subscribe