Hello Tamas Herman hermanta...@gmail.com :-)
You are now subscribed
so, i'd like to subscribe then :)
--
tom
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
im also checking back from time to time.
there is a lot to learn from PL.
im a long time anti-complexity fan too.
i was expressing this attitude of mine in SHell scripts and Rebol so far,
but since Rebol has started rotting, im looking for alternatives.
(by rotting, i mean the graphical version
beware of tinyproxy.
i used it for a while 2-3yrs ago as a regular web proxy
but it was very unstable.
just put an nginx in reverse proxy mode in front of pil.
--
tom
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
check this out, guys:
http://www.datomic.com/
i think it is a pretty nice architecture.
given picolisp has a couple of similar characteristics,
im very curious how do u compare them.
there are lots of pros and cons as i see...
--
tom
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
well, datomic does NOT provide write scalability,
similarly to mysql/postgres.
datomic can use very different storage backends, because
it uses only a fraction of their capabilities, and thats all it has to unify.
although they are closed source, they share the internals very deeply,
so your
hey jon,
i haven't had a look at c9 for over a year now, so i checked on it
today and i see they give a full shell in some kind of chroot on their
own servers, then u can deploy to heroku too and finally they can even
collaborate thru your own servers via ssh.
just out of curiosity, how do u run
and it was a perfectly clear explanation.
no the question is where should it go within the docs?
just put this example under the faq#segfault?
(which, btw, crashed my chrome on the 1st load, but worked on reload ;)
--
tom
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Oskar Wieland oskar.wiel...@gmx.de wrote:
It doesn't check at runtime for all possible error conditions which won't
occur during normal usage.
What is normal usage?
Normal usage means you are running a program which is written
following the rules described in
henrik,
there is http://hub.darcs.net/ with no limitations whatsoever on anything.
darcs is a lot more logical version control system.
it's a lot easier to remember it's options.
it's interactive by default.
avoids tons of merge conflicts automatically.
it doesn't try to invent branching/forking,
conditions?
like how much would it cost?
i live in hong kong, how can i get it?
actually i sounds like a good possible business...
like threadless.com, just
1, for small quantity designs
2, aided designs, like
a, select colors only
b, unicode character content only
c, digitized from bitmap
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:04:21PM +0100, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Github.com is more than a repo, it's a community of developers.
Hmm, this may well be. I have no idea, as I personally have no deep
interest in code
I'm on both networks and we actually use both at work and we are paid users
of both.
The current idea is to use bitbucket for the in-house private source repos
and github for the open source projects.
I don't have a strong preference for either one, because I think git is
suck in general.
I was a
Hello David,
There is an upcoming feature in Docker which allows building containers the
way you described.
It's called multi-stage builds:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/eng-image/multistage-build/
It's available in beta versions only for now.
Btw, I'm using https://www.notion.so/
14 matches
Mail list logo