On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 06:00:28PM +0100, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote:
> > Yes, gotta love lisp for the ability to do this (and other things). :)
> >
> But more often than not this features are not required in practice. Sadly
> it is just cool and not significant. :(
I would say it is very significant. F
> Yes, gotta love lisp for the ability to do this (and other things). :)
>
But more often than not this features are not required in practice. Sadly
it is just cool and not significant. :(
2017-02-26 17:06 GMT+01:00 Rick Hanson :
> A bit off-topic, but I like how this transformation
>
> On 25 F
A bit off-topic, but I like how this transformation
On 25 Feb 2017, 09:40:43 +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
>(if (not (cdr W))
> (Put C (car W))
> (Put (car (cdr W)) (car W)) )
> ->
>(Put
> (ifn (cdr W) C (cadr W))
> (car W) )
reminds me of factoring in high school
that mechanism, it is possible to create symbols with a local
access scope, not accessible from other parts of the program"
/Lindsay
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Alexander Burger
wrote:
> Hi Lindsay,
>
> > Bijective Burrows Wheeler Transform
> > https://github.com/t
Hi Lindsay,
> Bijective Burrows Wheeler Transform
> https://github.com/thinknlive/picolisp-bbwt
Cool! This code looks very good! :)
> As I was working on this I realized I need to start thinking about how to
> organize my code...
>
> The two main functions, encodeBBWT a
Bijective Burrows Wheeler Transform
https://github.com/thinknlive/picolisp-bbwt
As I was working on this I realized I need to start thinking about how to
organize my code...
The two main functions, encodeBBWT and decodeBBWT feel larger than they
should be because I have defined smaller
