Re: Emacs REPL not "full-featured"?

2016-01-02 Thread Alexis
Lawrence Bottorff writes: I've got a REPL started in Emacs (called from ELPA version of picolisp major mode with run-picolisp) The only picolisp-mode i'm aware of that's on an ELPA is my picolisp-mode on MELPA: http://melpa.org/#/picolisp-mode As the documentation on

Re: Emacs REPL not "full-featured"?

2016-01-02 Thread Henrik Sarvell
If the issue is only about jumping to docs perhaps picolisp-jump in my emacs init file might be of help: http://www.prodevtips.com/2015/02/18/my-emacs-init-file-for-2015/ On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Alexis wrote: > > Lawrence Bottorff writes: > >

Re: Emacs REPL not "full-featured"?

2016-01-02 Thread Alexis
Lawrence Bottorff writes: Yes, I've got this going in my init (*and *the ELPA installed) (add-to-list 'load-path "/home/hercynian/opt/picoLisp/lib/el") (load "tsm.el") ;; Picolisp TransientSymbolsMarkup (*Tsm) (autoload 'run-picolisp "inferior-picolisp") (autoload

Re: Emacs REPL not "full-featured"?

2016-01-02 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
Yes, I've got this going in my init (*and *the ELPA installed) (add-to-list 'load-path "/home/hercynian/opt/picoLisp/lib/el") (load "tsm.el") ;; Picolisp TransientSymbolsMarkup (*Tsm) (autoload 'run-picolisp "inferior-picolisp") (autoload 'picolisp-mode "picolisp" "Major mode for editing

Re: Emacs REPL not "full-featured"?

2016-01-01 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Lawrence Bottorff writes: > I've got a REPL started in Emacs (called from ELPA version of picolisp > major mode with run-picolisp), but I'm noticing it doesn't have such > features as more, edit, what, etc. Starting picolisp from the command > line with pil is however

Emacs REPL not "full-featured"?

2015-12-31 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
I've got a REPL started in Emacs (called from ELPA version of picolisp major mode with run-picolisp), but I'm noticing it doesn't have such features as more, edit, what, etc. Starting picolisp from the command line with pil is however "full-featured". What am I missing here? LB

RE: Emacs REPL not "full-featured"?

2015-12-31 Thread Loyall, David
> I've got a REPL started in Emacs [...] but I'm noticing it > doesn't have such features as more, edit, what, etc. Sounds like you didn’t load some libraries. When you pass a + character to the interpreter, it loads `debug.l`, which defines (what ...) and other functions. Maybe you can just