Hi,
: (list)
- (NIL)
That's fine, but why is this a problem then:
: (NIL)
!? (NIL)
NIL -- Undefined
/Jon
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
Hi,
: (list)
- (NIL)
That's fine, ...
Or is it? Why doesn't (list) evaluate to the same as () ?
I see that
: (length (list))
- 1
: (length (list 'A))
- 1
: (length ())
- 0
/Jon
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:15:16AM +0200, Jon Kleiser wrote:
: (list)
- (NIL)
That's fine, ...
Or is it? Why doesn't (list) evaluate to the same as () ?
This is a matter on how 'list' is defined. We had some time ago a
similar discussion with 'on' and 'off', I think.
Many functions
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the useful information! And thanks for using Sunday mornings
for things that matters. ;-)
/Jon
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:15:16AM +0200, Jon Kleiser wrote:
: (list)
- (NIL)
That's fine, ...
Or is it? Why doesn't (list) evaluate to the same as () ?
This is a
Hi Jon,
Thanks for the useful information! And thanks for using Sunday mornings
for things that matters. ;-)
No Problem. Sunday morning is an ideal time for that :-)
So let me explain a little more, because I think this is a central issue
in PicoLisp:
NIL is a very fundamental piece of data.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 01:30:49PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
So let me explain a little more, because I think this is a central issue
...
NIL is a very fundamental piece of data. It has a dual nature, being
...
I find this useful. So I edited a little, and posted it to the Wiki.
Please
