Hi Jon,
I think a couple of words in the ref.
(and or the tutorial) re. 'be' and new 'sym' clauses could be a good
thing.
True. So I have added a few lines to the reference of 'be' about that.
Let's hope it is comprehensible.
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
Hi,
I do the following simple pilog stuff:
: (be boy (alex))
- boy
: (be boy (bill))
- boy
: (get 'boy T)
- (((alex)) ((bill)))
: (be boy (chuck))
- boy
: (get 'boy T)
- (((alex)) ((bill)) ((chuck)))
: (be girl (diana))
- girl
: (get 'boy T)
- (((alex)) ((bill)) ((chuck)))
: (be boy (eddy))
-
Hi Jon,
: (be boy (alex))
- boy
...
: (be girl (diana))
- girl
...
: (be boy (eddy))
- boy
I'm not sure if this is documented in the references, but whenever 'be'
detects a new 'sym' clause, it considers the previous rules to be
finished.
This, when 'be boy' after 'be girl' is seen, the
