Re: ins@nity
> I starred it on github - the README deserves it purely on its own > merits :-D ...and the link to Infected Mushroom of course. I'm > guessing there too much coffee was involved? > Hey, thanks! It was getting late and the filter between my thoughts and what gets pushed to github was malfunctioning :) Decided to roll with it.
RE: ins@nity
- Original Message - From: andreas.rueeg...@itship.ch [mailto:andreas.rueeg...@itship.ch] To: picolisp@software-lab.de Sent: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:32:24 +0200 Subject: I like it! I will not use it in my work, but I find it a nice piece of coding art. It might help some people to understand how mapping functions and the @-last-result mechanism works. Maybe we should introduce perl-like obfuscation and ASCII-Art code style contests, although it violates the picolisp pillar of transparency ;-) - Original Message - From: Erik Gustafson [mailto:erik.d.gustaf...@gmail.com] To: picolisp@software-lab.de Sent: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:32:28 -0500 Subject: What's good everyone? I've really been liking the function 'map@' from a few threads back. I wrote a little library that follows this idea to its logical conclusion. It's mostly a joke, so have some fun with it! https://github.com/erdg/insanity Time for sleep, Erik
Re: ins@nity
On 25 August 2015 at 07:32, Erik Gustafson wrote: > ..[snip].. > https://github.com/erdg/insanity I starred it on github - the README deserves it purely on its own merits :-D ...and the link to Infected Mushroom of course. I'm guessing there too much coffee was involved? -- PGP fingerprint: BB0A 0787 C0EE BDD8 7F97 3D30 49F2 13A5 265D CCBD "There is a great difference between worry and concern. A worried person sees a problem, and a concerned person solves a problem." - Harold Stephens -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: ins@nity
Great question. Apologies if that was lost amongst the rest of the nonsense there. It simply provides an alternate syntax for the mapping functions (mapcar, seek, fish, etc). Instead of, (mapcar '((X) (doThings X) (1 2 3) ) you can write, (mapcar@ (1 2 3) (doThings @) ) Same idea applied to the rest of the mapping functions. Note that the function you pass to the mapper (e.g. doThings) is assumed to have only one argument, referred to by '@'. On Tuesday, August 25, 2015, jakob wrote: > Haha, I looked at it but what is it? :-) > > On August 25, 2015 6:32:28 AM CEST, Erik Gustafson < > erik.d.gustaf...@gmail.com > > wrote: >> >> What's good everyone? >> >> I've really been liking the function 'map@' from a few threads back. I >> wrote a little library that follows this idea to its logical conclusion
Re: ins@nity
Haha, I looked at it but what is it? :-) On August 25, 2015 6:32:28 AM CEST, Erik Gustafson wrote: >What's good everyone? > >I've really been liking the function 'map@' from a few threads back. I >wrote a little library that follows this idea to its logical >conclusion. >It's mostly a joke, so have some fun with it! > >https://github.com/erdg/insanity > >Time for sleep, >Erik -- Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
