Ok, Danilo... How about this then? :) http://www.technoblogy.com/show?1GX1
N.B. It's still "micro", not "pico"... I don't know how to evaluate a lisp
engine/language spec, but I know that picolisp is older and more widely used
(and it feels right to me).
Cheers,
--Dave
> From: Danilo Kordic
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 7:02 AM
>
> Interesting. Well nice try, I wouldn't call it v1.0 :D . It's Arduino (not
> AVR!), nuf' said.
>
>> From: Loyall, David
>> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:50 AM
>>
>> Perhaps picolisp can learn something from this project, but I expect they
>> can learn more from picolisp.
>>
>> http://www.ulisp.com/
