Re: Darwin Port for 64-bit PicoLisp
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:30:10PM +0100, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:17:10PM +0100, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > > It's not that bad, but it could be better documented. > > Here is what I could find: > > http://orangejuiceliberationfront.com/intel-assembler-on-mac-os-x/ > > And this: > http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/MachOTopics/1-Articles/dynamic_code.html > > https://www.hasustorm.com/books/English/OReilly.Mac.OS.X.Panther.For.Unix.Geeks.eBook-LiB.chm/0596006071_mpantherunix-chp-9-sect-3.html Nice! Perhaps some Mac users take this as a hint to jump on the train? :D Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: Darwin Port for 64-bit PicoLisp
Hi Jakob, > It's not that bad, but it could be better documented. > Here is what I could find: > http://orangejuiceliberationfront.com/intel-assembler-on-mac-os-x/ Thanks for the link. Unfortunately, I don't have a Mac, so I must rely on the input of Mac users. Despite that, I feel I should better take out the Darwin part for now, simply because it is broken and might just create confusion. Should the situation improve, we can easily add it back again. Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: Darwin Port for 64-bit PicoLisp
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:17:10PM +0100, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > It's not that bad, but it could be better documented. > Here is what I could find: > http://orangejuiceliberationfront.com/intel-assembler-on-mac-os-x/ And this: http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/MachOTopics/1-Articles/dynamic_code.html https://www.hasustorm.com/books/English/OReilly.Mac.OS.X.Panther.For.Unix.Geeks.eBook-LiB.chm/0596006071_mpantherunix-chp-9-sect-3.html // Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: Darwin Port for 64-bit PicoLisp
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:20:34PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > the Darwin entries in "src64/Makefile" are pretty useless, as the port > was never completed. It doesn't build as we have no input from the Mac > community concerning the position-independent code format. > > If nobody has any objections, I would remove that 'Darwin' entry from > "src64/Makefile". I think this would not be a big loss, as the Mac is > not a developer-friendly machine anyway. It's not that bad, but it could be better documented. Here is what I could find: http://orangejuiceliberationfront.com/intel-assembler-on-mac-os-x/ //Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
