Hi Jon, > For quite some time I've felt that the ref. documentation for the > 'for' forms could need some improvements. The 'for' function is a
Very true! > What I've done is (a) inserted a few <br> line breaks so that the > descriptions of the three forms are separated, and so that it will > be a little clearer that the sentence starting with "If a clause has > NIL or T .." may apply to all the three forms. Then (b) I have > organized the examples into three groups, one group for each form, > adding examples for the first form (that was entirely missing). Take > a look at (and copy what you like from) my enhanced docs here: > <http://folk.uio.no/jkleiser/pico/doc/refF.html#for> Great! You are right, now it is much better. Many thanks! I've incorporated your changes. Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
