Re: Minor diff between 32-bit and Ersatz re. "redefined"

2014-12-11 Thread Alexander Burger 
Hi Jakob,

> > Oops, yes, very good! That's a bug in 'dm', in the place where the
> > values are compared. I've fixed it.
> 
> A bug in Erzats?

Yes, that's right. In Ersatz.
♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Minor diff between 32-bit and Ersatz re. "redefined"

2014-12-11 Thread Jakob Eriksson 


On December 11, 2014 at 3:39 PM Alexander Burger  wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> > (dm T (X Y) (=: x X) (=: y Y))
> > and then repeat the last line, then Ersatz will say "# T +Shape
> > redefined", but 32-bit PicoLisp will give no such "redefined" warning. It
> > may not matter very much, I just wanted to mention it. (I haven’t tried
> > 64-bit.)
>
> Oops, yes, very good! That's a bug in 'dm', in the place where the
> values are compared. I've fixed it.

A bug in Erzats?

--jakob
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Minor diff between 32-bit and Ersatz re. "redefined"

2014-12-11 Thread Alexander Burger 
Hi Jon,

> (dm T (X Y) (=: x X) (=: y Y))
> and then repeat the last line, then Ersatz will say "# T +Shape redefined", 
> but 32-bit PicoLisp will give no such "redefined" warning. It may not matter 
> very much, I just wanted to mention it. (I haven’t tried 64-bit.)

Oops, yes, very good! That's a bug in 'dm', in the place where the
values are compared. I've fixed it.

Thanks Jon!!
♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe