On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:18:22PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 10:24:59AM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity: does PicoLisp have some mechanism for dumping the
> > process image (or some equivalent effect) so you can save a PicoLisp
> > process i
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 10:24:59AM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
> Just out of curiosity: does PicoLisp have some mechanism for dumping the
> process image (or some equivalent effect) so you can save a PicoLisp
> process in a certain state and restart it there.
Not completely I think. What come
Just out of curiosity: does PicoLisp have some mechanism for dumping the
process image (or some equivalent effect) so you can save a PicoLisp
process in a certain state and restart it there.
On 04/28/2017 08:54 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:08:35AM -0800, Christopher How
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:08:35AM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
> Sounds like quite a project in and of itself.
Indeed.
You might consider to take ErsatzLisp (or miniPicoLisp), and throw out all I/O
functionality, and other system accesses like Runtime...exec().
♪♫ Alex
> On 04/27/2017 10:1
Sounds like quite a project in and of itself.
On 04/27/2017 10:18 PM, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote:
> I thought about the same.
> My insights are:
> You can 'let all relevant symbols with alternative functions or just
> NIL. Adresses 1 & 2
> You might want to change the repl in a way that if for example th
I thought about the same.
My insights are:
You can 'let all relevant symbols with alternative functions or just NIL.
Adresses 1 & 2
You might want to change the repl in a way that if for example the symbols
car and list are evaluated they return a meaningless number. (It might be
possible to calcul