Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-19 Thread Alexander Burger
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:28:02PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: > > Hmm, strange. The canvas is also driven by JavaScript ... > > update, after hitting the canvas button and waiting some minutes the demo > actually appears. CPU usage of bin/picolisp is one full CPU. It does not > seem to go back to

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-18 Thread Richard Z
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:27:45PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: > > > I won't think so, as this animation is driven by JavaScript (the '(+Click > > > +Auto > > > +Button) in "demo/fields.l"), which stops as soon as the browser leaves

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-15 Thread Richard Z
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:27:45PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: > > > I won't think so, as this animation is driven by JavaScript (the '(+Click > > > +Auto > > > +Button) in "demo/fields.l"), which stops as soon as the browser leaves

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-15 Thread Alexander Burger
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > BTW, I test this with a split screen, Termux in one and PilBox in the other > window. In Termux I run a "cpu" script. In case somebody wants to try: > > > #!/data/data/com.termux/files/usr/bin/pil > ... Forgot to mention that

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-15 Thread Alexander Burger
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:27:45PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: > > I won't think so, as this animation is driven by JavaScript (the '(+Click > > +Auto > > +Button) in "demo/fields.l"), which stops as soon as the browser leaves the > > page. Not sure what happens ... > > you are right, after playing

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-12 Thread Richard Z
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 03:49:45PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:10:33PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: > > it happened when I downloaded the zips with Firefox. I have no idea if I > > have > > closed PilBox properly before, will try again. The first download (calc) > >

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-11 Thread Alexander Burger
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:10:33PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: > it happened when I downloaded the zips with Firefox. I have no idea if I have > closed PilBox properly before, will try again. The first download (calc) went I see. In fact, I have not investigated what happes if a PIL.zip is pushed

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-11 Thread Richard Z
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 08:45:01AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:25:26PM +0100, Richard Z wrote: > > I installed one example, looked at options/PILs. Then installed another > > example and somehow got the old page listing the PILs as they were in the > > old state.

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-10 Thread Richard Z
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:54:06PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: Hi, > However, I do not understand what you mean with "totally inconsistent and > obsolete set of pages". Can you explain? I installed one example, looked at options/PILs. Then installed another example and somehow got the old

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-10 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Richard, > works thus far. > > One problem that I notice is that the UI gets totally confused with both the > device back arrow and the PilBox own back/forward arrows. Device back arrow > apparently exits the app. Right. This is the standard Android behavior of the device back arrow, and I

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-10 Thread Richard Z
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:50:08PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: Hi, > PilBox now also runs on Android/Arm32 (albeit a bit slower), via the > installation of an "Architecture Plugin". thanks, wanted to do it myself but was too lazy:) > This is simply a ZIP file, just like the "normal"