Re: The order of arguments in diff

Wao, the next release?! Thank you! I'm really glad my question could help that much. I'm looking forward to it! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:35:30PM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote: > > So, a better description of diff

Re: The order of arguments in diff

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:35:30PM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote: > So, a better description of diff might be "Returns all the elements in the > first argument that are not in the second argument"? Right, very good! I changed it, will be in the next release. Thanks! ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: The order of arguments in diff

Thanks Alex. So, a better description of diff might be "Returns all the elements in the first argument that are not in the second argument"? On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:05:44PM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote: > > I was

Re: The order of arguments in diff

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:05:44PM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote: > I was trying out the diff function and I noticed something: > > : (diff '(1 2 3 4) '(3 4)) > -> (1 2) > > but > > : (diff '(3 4) '(1 2 3 4)) > -> NIL > > I think this means that there is an order to the arguments of diff, where