Re: Version 17.12 question / error

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:58:38PM +0200, Henrik Sarvell wrote: > Regarding detach, would this be a proper way of doing a server where detach > is optional?: > > (de server (P H Detach) >... >(loop > (setq *Sock (listen P)) > (NIL (fork) (close P)) > (close *Sock) ) >

Re: Version 17.12 question / error

Hi Henrik, > Thanks Alex, will try and find the time to refactor all the local calls in > the ext library sources. Yes, sorry for the confusion! The change in namespace semantics last year was a serious cut, but namespaces in PicoLisp were relatively new at that time, and the change resulted in

Re: Version 17.12 question / error

I bit the bullet and refactored, all is good now with the newest version. Regarding detach, would this be a proper way of doing a server where detach is optional?: (de server (P H Detach) (setq *Port P P (port *Port) *Home (cons H (chop H))) (gc) (loop (setq *Sock (listen P))

Re: Version 17.12 question / error

Henrik Sarvell writes: > I should probably create a small writeup on how to do that > for a typical PL project listening on a non standard port. https://logand.com/blog/picolisp-behind-nginx-proxy.html from 22sep2009, time flies! -- UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: Version 17.12 question / error

Thanks Alex, will try and find the time to refactor all the local calls in the ext library sources. Regarding ssl and httpGate, I'm managing proxy forwarding with Nginx these days (encrypted too) so I could actually just delete them as I don't use them anymore. I should probably create a small

Re: Version 17.12 question / error

Hi Henrik, > When I try to run my stuff I get [ext/base.l:9] pico -- Bad symbol namespace > > And that file currently looks like this: > https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/ext/src/31474ae47656ae0c020f7009c9ed14c5cc86cc44/base.l?at=default=file-view-default It is the 'local' call: (local num?)