Thanks for your 2 cents worth, Alex -- and for 'picolisp-json' , which
the code uses, and which is really great . Now I don't need NodeJS !
I agree, that particular code was a 1st working version horrible
"quick and dirty" coded version, a much better version is attached.
But the point of
Hi Jason,
I don't want to be rude, but to put emphasis on what Alexander Burger
wrote, your code is really bad. It doesn't follow any of the very simple
"naming conventions" of PicoLisp, and it doesn't even follow other
LISP "coding conventions". It's hard to read, difficult to grok, messy,
