There is lots of discussion on the mail archive on this topic over the
years.
http://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp@software-lab.de/msg03860.html
There are others. Try searching tail recursion, macros, fexpr.
The mail archive has been an excellent source of information on picolisp.
I haven't found
I will think about doing a f-expr for that.
Am 12.02.2017 11:50 schrieb "Mike Pechkin" :
> write yourself recursion call and you will see you don't need macro.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Christopher Howard <
> christopher.how...@qlfiles.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi list. I got the impression fr
write yourself recursion call and you will see you don't need macro.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Christopher Howard <
christopher.how...@qlfiles.net> wrote:
> Hi list. I got the impression from some of the documentation that we
> aren't planning to implement TCO in picoLisp, and that the pr
Hi list. I got the impression from some of the documentation that we
aren't planning to implement TCO in picoLisp, and that the preferred
approach is to just use a loop. I don't want to argue against that, but
I was just wondering if perhaps somebody had a macro that made a loop
look like a recursi