Wao, the next release?! Thank you! I'm really glad my question could help
that much. I'm looking forward to it!
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Alexander Burger
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:35:30PM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote:
> > So, a better description of diff might be "Returns all the
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:35:30PM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote:
> So, a better description of diff might be "Returns all the elements in the
> first argument that are not in the second argument"?
Right, very good! I changed it, will be in the next release.
Thanks!
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:p
Thanks Alex.
So, a better description of diff might be "Returns all the elements in the
first argument that are not in the second argument"?
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Alexander Burger
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:05:44PM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote:
> > I was trying out the diff func
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:05:44PM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote:
> I was trying out the diff function and I noticed something:
>
> : (diff '(1 2 3 4) '(3 4))
> -> (1 2)
>
> but
>
> : (diff '(3 4) '(1 2 3 4))
> -> NIL
>
> I think this means that there is an order to the arguments of diff, where
It
I was trying out the diff function and I noticed something:
: (diff '(1 2 3 4) '(3 4))
-> (1 2)
but
: (diff '(3 4) '(1 2 3 4))
-> NIL
I think this means that there is an order to the arguments of diff, where
the second argument must be the shortest.
I wanted to ask if this was correct, and als