[jira] Created: (PIG-1221) Filter equality does not work for tuples

Filter equality does not work for tuples Key: PIG-1221 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1221 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Components: impl Affects Versions: 0.5.0

[jira] Updated: (PIG-259) allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Zhang updated PIG-259: --- Attachment: Pig_259.patch I choose the keyword overwrite to indicate user want to overwrite the file. The

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1217) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829557#action_12829557 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1217: -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1219) Extra listStatus call to the namenode in WeightedRangePartitioner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829575#action_12829575 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1219: -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1217) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829589#action_12829589 ] Dmitriy V. Ryaboy commented on PIG-1217: The test failures appear to be unrelated to

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1046) join algorithm specification is within double quotes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829608#action_12829608 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1046: +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1221) Filter equality does not work for tuples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829618#action_12829618 ] Ashutosh Chauhan commented on PIG-1221: --- Looking at code it seems we don't support

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1217) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmitriy V. Ryaboy updated PIG-1217: --- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Huh. I wonder what Hudson tested -- I accidentally

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1217) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmitriy V. Ryaboy updated PIG-1217: --- Attachment: fix_top_udf.diff [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1217) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmitriy V. Ryaboy updated PIG-1217: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1219) Extra listStatus call to the namenode in WeightedRangePartitioner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Dai updated PIG-1219: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Extra listStatus call to the namenode in WeightedRangePartitioner

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1219) Extra listStatus call to the namenode in WeightedRangePartitioner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Dai updated PIG-1219: Attachment: PIG-1219-3.patch The test failure is because the way we test it, not the core code. We now

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1217) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829688#action_12829688 ] Alan Gates commented on PIG-1217: - In general, looks good. A comment on Top.Initial. If you

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1219) Extra listStatus call to the namenode in WeightedRangePartitioner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829690#action_12829690 ] Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-1219: - I asked Pradeep to also review the code - just to

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1209) Port POJoinPackage to proactively spill

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829691#action_12829691 ] Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-1209: - +1. Changes look good Port POJoinPackage to

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1217) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829694#action_12829694 ] Dmitriy V. Ryaboy commented on PIG-1217: I see, thanks for the tip. How does this

[jira] Commented: (PIG-259) allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829697#action_12829697 ] Alan Gates commented on PIG-259: A few comments and questions on this: 1) We should make this

[jira] Commented: (PIG-259) allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829728#action_12829728 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-259: --- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1046) join algorithm specification is within double quotes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829731#action_12829731 ] Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-1046: - (1) I think the error message should be made a

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1131) Pig simple join does not work when it contains empty lines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829736#action_12829736 ] Ashutosh Chauhan commented on PIG-1131: --- Can't reproduce this on trunk. PIG-1194

[jira] Created: (PIG-1222) cast ends up with NULL value

cast ends up with NULL value Key: PIG-1222 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1222 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Ying He I want to generate data with bags, so I did this, take

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1178) LogicalPlan and Optimizer are too complex and hard to work with

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829759#action_12829759 ] Alan Gates commented on PIG-1178: - Comments that came out of a review of the twiki doc the

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1209) Port POJoinPackage to proactively spill

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashutosh Chauhan updated PIG-1209: -- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Patch checked-in. Port

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1217) [piggybank] evaluation.util.Top is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829811#action_12829811 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1217: +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1046) join algorithm specification is within double quotes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashutosh Chauhan updated PIG-1046: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) join algorithm specification is within double quotes

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1046) join algorithm specification is within double quotes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashutosh Chauhan updated PIG-1046: -- Attachment: pig-1046_4.patch Updated patch incorporating Olga's comments. join algorithm

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1046) join algorithm specification is within double quotes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashutosh Chauhan updated PIG-1046: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) join algorithm specification is within double quotes

[jira] Created: (PIG-1223) [zebra] Add cli to help admin zebra

[zebra] Add cli to help admin zebra --- Key: PIG-1223 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1223 Project: Pig Issue Type: Wish Reporter: He Yongqiang -- This message is automatically

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1219) Extra listStatus call to the namenode in WeightedRangePartitioner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829865#action_12829865 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1219: +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Updated: (PIG-834) incorrect plan when algebraic functions are nested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashutosh Chauhan updated PIG-834: - Attachment: pig-834.patch In this patch, I look for a pattern of POUserFunc followed by another

What's Zebra?

What's the architecture of Zebra? Do it depend on Pig and HDFS? Please help. I hope it's following: DFS is better for unstructed data, but DTS (not bigtable) is better for structed data, data warehouse is structed, so I think a table is better than a file. DTS is following: 1. Break a logic

Re: What's Zebra?

You can refer here http://wiki.apache.org/pig/zebra 2010/2/5 jian yi eyj...@gmail.com What's the architecture of Zebra? Do it depend on Pig and HDFS? Please help. I hope it's following: DFS is better for unstructed data, but DTS (not bigtable) is better for structed data, data

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1046) join algorithm specification is within double quotes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829962#action_12829962 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1046: +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Updated: (PIG-259) allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Zhang updated PIG-259: --- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[jira] Updated: (PIG-259) allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Zhang updated PIG-259: --- Attachment: Pig_259_2.patch allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[jira] Commented: (PIG-259) allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829981#action_12829981 ] Jeff Zhang commented on PIG-259: Response to Alan regarding his comments, 1. I put the logic

[jira] Commented: (PIG-259) allow store to overwrite existing directroy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829982#action_12829982 ] Jeff Zhang commented on PIG-259: Alan, Should I create a new sub task under Pig-966 ? or is