Build failed in Hudson: Pig-trunk #633

2009-12-02 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-trunk/633/changes Changes: [gates] PIG-1098 Zebra Performance Optimizations. -- [...truncated 2691 lines...] ivy-init-dirs: ivy-probe-antlib: ivy-init-antlib: ivy-init: ivy-buildJar: [ivy:resolve] ::

[jira] Commented: (PIG-965) PERFORMANCE: optimize common case in matches (PORegex)

2009-12-02 Thread Thejas M Nair (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784849#action_12784849 ] Thejas M Nair commented on PIG-965: --- In the above performance numbers, I assume optimization

[jira] Commented: (PIG-922) Logical optimizer: push up project

2009-12-02 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784879#action_12784879 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-922: --- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (PIG-966) Proposed rework for LoadFunc, StoreFunc, and Slice/r interfaces

2009-12-02 Thread Dmitriy V. Ryaboy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784901#action_12784901 ] Dmitriy V. Ryaboy commented on PIG-966: --- Quick question: I don't remember if we've gone

[jira] Commented: (PIG-966) Proposed rework for LoadFunc, StoreFunc, and Slice/r interfaces

2009-12-02 Thread Alan Gates (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784931#action_12784931 ] Alan Gates commented on PIG-966: You can make an argument for putting it in either place. I

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1068) COGROUP fails with 'Type mismatch in key from map: expected org.apache.pig.impl.io.NullableText, recieved org.apache.pig.impl.io.NullableTuple'

2009-12-02 Thread Richard Ding (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Ding updated PIG-1068: -- Attachment: PIG-1068.patch This patch fixed the problem by moving the unwrapping logic from demuxer to

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1068) COGROUP fails with 'Type mismatch in key from map: expected org.apache.pig.impl.io.NullableText, recieved org.apache.pig.impl.io.NullableTuple'

2009-12-02 Thread Richard Ding (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Ding updated PIG-1068: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) COGROUP fails with 'Type mismatch in key from map: expected

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1111) [Zebra] multiple outputs support

2009-12-02 Thread Gaurav Jain (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gaurav Jain updated PIG-: - Affects Version/s: 0.7.0 0.6.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open)

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1118) expression with aggregate functions returning null, with accumulate interface

2009-12-02 Thread Ying He (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ying He updated PIG-1118: - Attachment: PIG_1118.patch bug fix. expression with aggregate functions returning null, with accumulate

[jira] Commented: (PIG-922) Logical optimizer: push up project

2009-12-02 Thread Pradeep Kamath (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784985#action_12784985 ] Pradeep Kamath commented on PIG-922: I reviewed the changes to pass the load signature to

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1086) Nested sort by * throw exception

2009-12-02 Thread Richard Ding (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784992#action_12784992 ] Richard Ding commented on PIG-1086: --- The script works if the input has no schema: {code} A

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1111) [Zebra] multiple outputs support

2009-12-02 Thread Gaurav Jain (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gaurav Jain updated PIG-: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Submitting an update [Zebra] multiple outputs support

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1118) expression with aggregate functions returning null, with accumulate interface

2009-12-02 Thread Olga Natkovich (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785025#action_12785025 ] Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-1118: - Ying, the change looks good. Please, add a unit

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1118) expression with aggregate functions returning null, with accumulate interface

2009-12-02 Thread Olga Natkovich (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Olga Natkovich updated PIG-1118: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) expression with aggregate functions returning null, with

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1068) COGROUP fails with 'Type mismatch in key from map: expected org.apache.pig.impl.io.NullableText, recieved org.apache.pig.impl.io.NullableTuple'

2009-12-02 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785029#action_12785029 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1068: +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1118) expression with aggregate functions returning null, with accumulate interface

2009-12-02 Thread Ying He (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785043#action_12785043 ] Ying He commented on PIG-1118: -- Olga, thank for review. A unit test is in the patch,

[jira] Created: (PIG-1120) [zebra] should support using org.apache.hadoop.zebra.pig.TableStorer() if user does not want to specify storage hint

2009-12-02 Thread Jing Huang (JIRA)
[zebra] should support using org.apache.hadoop.zebra.pig.TableStorer() if user does not want to specify storage hint - Key: PIG-1120 URL:

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1118) expression with aggregate functions returning null, with accumulate interface

2009-12-02 Thread Olga Natkovich (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Olga Natkovich updated PIG-1118: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Thanks, I am not sure how I missed it :) expression with

[jira] Created: (PIG-1121) [zebre] zebra user forces pig script to have 'as xxx' in foreach statement in order to be able to store successfully

2009-12-02 Thread Jing Huang (JIRA)
[zebre] zebra user forces pig script to have 'as xxx' in foreach statement in order to be able to store successfully Key: PIG-1121 URL:

[jira] Created: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Yan Zhou (JIRA)
[zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version -- Key: PIG-1122 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122 Project: Pig Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.7.0 Reporter:

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Yan Zhou (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yan Zhou updated PIG-1122: -- Attachment: PIG-1122.patch [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Yan Zhou (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yan Zhou updated PIG-1122: -- Attachment: (was: PIG-1122.patch) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1114) MultiQuery optimization throws error when merging 2 level splits

2009-12-02 Thread Olga Natkovich (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785115#action_12785115 ] Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-1114: - +1 on the changes. will be committing now to trunk

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Yan Zhou (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yan Zhou updated PIG-1122: -- Attachment: PIG-1122.patch [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Yan Zhou (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785118#action_12785118 ] Yan Zhou commented on PIG-1122: --- Note that the patch should be applied to trunk. Also note

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Yan Zhou (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yan Zhou updated PIG-1122: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

[jira] Updated: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Yan Zhou (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yan Zhou updated PIG-1122: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Yan Zhou (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785123#action_12785123 ] Yan Zhou commented on PIG-1122: --- This has not caused any problems since the CLASSPATH also

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1122) [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

2009-12-02 Thread Chao Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785127#action_12785127 ] Chao Wang commented on PIG-1122: +1 [zebra] Zebra build.xml still uses 0.6 version

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1116) Remove redundant map-reduce job for merge join

2009-12-02 Thread Olga Natkovich (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785134#action_12785134 ] Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-1116: - +1 Remove redundant map-reduce job for merge

[jira] Updated: (PIG-922) Logical optimizer: push up project

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Dai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Dai updated PIG-922: --- Attachment: PIG-922-p3_14.patch Address the review comments from Pradeep. Actually we do not need to do

[jira] Updated: (PIG-922) Logical optimizer: push up project

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Dai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Dai updated PIG-922: --- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Logical optimizer: push up project --

[jira] Updated: (PIG-922) Logical optimizer: push up project

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel Dai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Dai updated PIG-922: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Logical optimizer: push up project --

[jira] Commented: (PIG-1118) expression with aggregate functions returning null, with accumulate interface

2009-12-02 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785166#action_12785166 ] Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1118: -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest