RE: [VOTE] Branch for Pig 0.6.0 release

2009-11-12 Thread Olga Natkovich
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Branch for Pig 0.6.0 release +1. In addition to the new features we've added, our change to use Hadoop's LineRecordReader brought Pig to parity with Hadoop in the PigMix tests, about a 30% average performance improvement. This should be huge for our users. Alan. On Nov 9

RE: [VOTE] Branch for Pig 0.6.0 release

2009-11-12 Thread Olga Natkovich
I created the branch. Trunk is open for commits. Olga -Original Message- From: Olga Natkovich Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:46 AM To: 'pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org' Subject: RE: [VOTE] Branch for Pig 0.6.0 release We have 4 +1 votes for this and no -1s. I am about to create 0.6.0

RE: [VOTE] Branch for Pig 0.6.0 release

2009-11-10 Thread Pradeep Kamath
+1 -Original Message- From: Alan Gates [mailto:ga...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 12:43 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Branch for Pig 0.6.0 release +1. In addition to the new features we've added, our change to use Hadoop's LineRecordReader

Re: [VOTE] Branch for Pig 0.6.0 release

2009-11-10 Thread Jianyong Dai
+1. I think Jeff's patch for the file system commands (PIG-891) also deserve some advertisement. Those commands are really handy to the end users. Daniel Alan Gates wrote: +1. In addition to the new features we've added, our change to use Hadoop's LineRecordReader brought Pig to parity

Re: [VOTE] Branch for Pig 0.6.0 release

2009-11-09 Thread Alan Gates
+1. In addition to the new features we've added, our change to use Hadoop's LineRecordReader brought Pig to parity with Hadoop in the PigMix tests, about a 30% average performance improvement. This should be huge for our users. Alan. On Nov 9, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: