RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
I am doing it now. Santhosh -Original Message- From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:32 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote. No one -1'd Olga's proposal. nige. On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote: Nigel, It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the email that was sent out back then. Thanks, Santhosh -Original Message- From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2 weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then? Nige On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote: -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite there. I would prefer 0.2.0 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will require a little bit more work. 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces Santhosh -Original Message- From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) Pig Committers, I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system performance. The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed as being without a license header. All these files are generated by javacc. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th. Olga From: Olga Natkovich ol...@yahoo-inc.com Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Next pig release Reply-To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Pig Developers and Committers, Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I propose that it is time for the next release. I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable interfaces. Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote. No one -1'd Olga's proposal. nige. On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote: Nigel, It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the email that was sent out back then. Thanks, Santhosh -Original Message- From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2 weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then? Nige On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote: -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite there. I would prefer 0.2.0 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will require a little bit more work. 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces Santhosh -Original Message- From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) Pig Committers, I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system performance. The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed as being without a license header. All these files are generated by javacc. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th. Olga From: Olga Natkovich ol...@yahoo-inc.com Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Next pig release Reply-To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Pig Developers and Committers, Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I propose that it is time for the next release. I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable interfaces. Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
README.txt still has the incubator text in it. This needs to be removed. I'll roll a new package and call a new vote. Alan. On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: Pig Committers, I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system performance. The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed as being without a license header. All these files are generated by javacc. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th. Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2 weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then? Nige On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote: -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite there. I would prefer 0.2.0 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will require a little bit more work. 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces Santhosh -Original Message- From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) Pig Committers, I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system performance. The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed as being without a license header. All these files are generated by javacc. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th. Olga
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Hmm, does not look like the attachment made it through again. One more try. Olga -Original Message- From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) Pig Committers, I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system performance. The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed as being without a license header. All these files are generated by javacc. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th. Olga