Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] Implement piglet to test GL_EXT_buffer_storage.

Could you extend my test instead of copying it? You could certainly add an "es" parameter to my test and add conditional code that is only executed on GLES. Marek On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Ryan Houdek wrote: > This has been tested on the Nvidia proprietary driver

[Piglit] [PATCH v3] Implement piglit to test GL_EXT_buffer_storage.

This has been tested on the Nvidia proprietary driver and llvmpipe. This piglit requires GLES 3.1 support due to glMemoryBarrier. To test Mesa I temporarily moved glMemoryBarrier as a ES 3.0 function. --- tests/all.py | 9 + tests/spec/CMakeLists.txt

[Piglit] [PATCH v3] Add support for feature readiness.

This adds a new "summary feature" command to piglit which creates a HTML table with the feature x DUT status (useful for multiple features, multiple DUTs). Another use case is the feature status for subsequent test results (depending on the meaning of that test result - DUT or build) A feature

[Piglit] [PATCH 2/2] SSO: new test to ensure matching with various qualifier

Test is composed of 2 major steps. First part ensure that a matching (same on both VS & FS) qualifier doesn't pertubate the location assignment Second part ensure that a non-matching qualifier also work. Final interpolation qualifier is the one of the FS. Technically it is only allowed from

[Piglit] [PATCH 0/2] V4: SSO: new test to ensure correct deadcode optimization

Related to mesa issue: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79783 Mostly "Validated" on Nvidia driver. Nvidia fails to link vs_fs_prog_separate_inactive on first test v4: * Add both test to all.py v3: * Add a new test to ensure matching with various qualifier To be discussed. I don't

[Piglit] [PATCH 1/2] SSO: new test to ensure correct deadcode optimization

Related to mesa issue: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79783 Mostly "Validated" on Nvidia driver. Nvidia fails to link vs_fs_prog_separate_inactive v3: add the test to all.py v2: * Test both output and input are still active * Test real interstage variable are still optimized *

Re: [Piglit] [PATCHv2 0/5] arb-enhanced-layouts: explicit-offset piglits

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:20 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 1 November 2015 at 22:53, Timothy Arceri > wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 15:34 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Hi Emil, > > > > A few comments: > > > > - Patches 1-4 all have extra

Re: [Piglit] Cleanup tesselation generators

Since I have review on some of them, and they've been on the list a while. I am planning to push patches 1-16 shortly. These are just small cleanup patches (comments, formatting changes, using six for a few functions, using textwrap, etc). None of these result in functional changes or in any

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH v2 3/5] arb-enhanced-layouts: explicit-offset: relative offset values

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:28 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 1 November 2015 at 22:03, Timothy Arceri > wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 15:34 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > > > From: Emil Velikov > > > > > > Check if one member is

[Piglit] [PATCH] glsl-1.20: vector function inout self assignment tests

From: Timothy Arceri vs-array-inout-self-assignment-vec2: Tests for nir assert. vs-array-inout-self-assignment-vec2-swizzle: Test that the assignment is not optimised out if it involves a swizzle. Cc: Ilia Mirkin ---

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] arb_copy_image: if formats different, make sure they can be reinterpreted

On 10/28/2015 12:55 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: This prevents the test from trying to copy compressed formats to depth textures and vice-versa. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin --- tests/spec/arb_copy_image/formats.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] getteximage-depth: new test to create/readback depth textures

On 11/02/2015 05:24 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: From: Dave Airlie for every supported target for all the depth/stencil formats this creates a texture, and then uses glGetTexImage to read it back. --- tests/texturing/CMakeLists.gl.txt | 1 +

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] arb_copy_image: if formats different, make sure they can be reinterpreted

I did... commit 3ddd90f5ad5e8f74af46e4b41b325fe110c5850e upstream. (Without your R-b since you hadn't explicitly supplied it at the time.) On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Brian Paul wrote: > On 10/28/2015 12:55 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> This prevents the test from trying

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] arb_copy_image: if formats different, make sure they can be reinterpreted

On 11/03/2015 09:32 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: I did... commit 3ddd90f5ad5e8f74af46e4b41b325fe110c5850e upstream. (Without your R-b since you hadn't explicitly supplied it at the time.) OK, thanks. I guess I missed it. -Brian On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Brian Paul