On 12/03/2014 05:16 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 01/12/14 18:17, Chad Versace wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/01/2014 09:41 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2014 01:11 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
Things are not as black and white as you might think. Most of piglit
uses what I call "target-less
On 01/12/14 18:17, Chad Versace wrote:
>
>
> On 12/01/2014 09:41 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
>> On 11/26/2014 01:11 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>>> Things are not as black and white as you might think. Most of piglit
>>> uses what I call "target-less rules", which means that when one does
>>>
>>>a
On 12/01/2014 09:41 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
> On 11/26/2014 01:11 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> Things are not as black and white as you might think. Most of piglit
>> uses what I call "target-less rules", which means that when one does
>>
>>add_definitions ( -DPIGLIT_USE_GLX )
>> or
>>li
On 25/11/14 18:45, Mark Janes wrote:
> This patched fixed the gl tests, but I encountered the same error for
> gles1/gles2/gles3.
>
> Piglit built for me when I added the same link instruction to:
>
> tests/util/CMakeLists.gles1.txt
> tests/util/CMakeLists.gles2.txt
> tests/util/CMakeLists.gles3.
This patched fixed the gl tests, but I encountered the same error for
gles1/gles2/gles3.
Piglit built for me when I added the same link instruction to:
tests/util/CMakeLists.gles1.txt
tests/util/CMakeLists.gles2.txt
tests/util/CMakeLists.gles3.txt
Is there a more specific (GLES) link instruction
Similar to the earlier patch for waffle-less (glut) builds. The need
for this patch became apparent as we removed the libGL link dependency
in waffle.
Cc: Mark Janes
Reported-by: Mark Janes
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
tests/util/CMakeLists.gl.txt | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Similar to the earlier patch for waffle-less (glut) builds. The need
for this patch became apparent as we removed the libGL link dependency
in waffle.
Cc: Mark Janes
Reported-by: Mark Janes
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
tests/util/CMakeLists.gl.txt | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
