On 09/10/2014 02:28 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
[Resend without the giant attachment that made the list angry.]
On 09/09/2014 11:19 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 09/08/2014 09:58 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi Ian;
I was planning to have a 'custom' layout-std140 test with some doubles
included. I think
[Resend without the giant attachment that made the list angry.]
On 09/09/2014 11:19 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 09/08/2014 09:58 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi Ian;
I was planning to have a 'custom' layout-std140 test with some doubles
included. I think I will instead copy-paste this one and add
From: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
This comes almost verbatim from the ARB_uniform_buffer_object spec.
It's also mostly redundant with the layout-std140 test... which will be
removed soon.
This test passes on NVIDIA's closed source driver (version 331.89 on
GTX260)
Signed-off-by: Ian
Hi Ian;
I was planning to have a 'custom' layout-std140 test with some doubles
included. I think I will instead copy-paste this one and add doubles in
to the mix. Is there any way I could introduce optional content in to
this test when extension is present or should I rather make a copy of
the
