On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:16:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 04:56 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:05:49PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >> On 11/20/2015 02:14 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Fro
On 11/20/2015 04:56 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:05:49PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 11/20/2015 02:14 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick
If this test has problems with odd sample cou
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:05:49PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 02:14 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >> From: Ian Romanick
> >>
> >> If this test has problems with odd sample counts, the test should detect
> >> that and SKIP
On 11/20/2015 02:14 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> From: Ian Romanick
>>
>> If this test has problems with odd sample counts, the test should detect
>> that and SKIP.
>
> I'm not sure I agree. I think it's pretty reasonable for all.py to
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> If this test has problems with odd sample counts, the test should detect
> that and SKIP.
I'm not sure I agree. I think it's pretty reasonable for all.py to only
pass valid inputs to a test binary.
>
> Signe
From: Ian Romanick
If this test has problems with odd sample counts, the test should detect
that and SKIP.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
tests/all.py | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/all.py b/tests/all.py
index 1038e07..abe7da2 100644
--- a/te