Re: [Piglit] [PATCH RESEND] cl: Fix image support when built on CL<1.2

2016-04-26 Thread Jan Vesely
On Sun, 2016-04-24 at 10:08 +0200, Serge Martin wrote: > On Monday 04 April 2016 08:55:48 Jan Vesely wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 21:17 -0400, Jan Vesely wrote: > > > > > > Provide our own image_desc structure since it's too tangled to > > > remove. > > > Tests that require OCL 1.2

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH RESEND] cl: Fix image support when built on CL<1.2

2016-04-24 Thread Serge Martin
On Monday 04 April 2016 08:55:48 Jan Vesely wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 21:17 -0400, Jan Vesely wrote: > > Provide our own image_desc structure since it's too tangled to > > remove. > > Tests that require OCL 1.2 result in WARN: > > Piglit was compiled with lower OpenCL version (1.1) than

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH RESEND] cl: Fix image support when built on CL<1.2

2016-04-04 Thread Jan Vesely
On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 21:17 -0400, Jan Vesely wrote: > Provide our own image_desc structure since it's too tangled to > remove. > Tests that require OCL 1.2 result in WARN: > Piglit was compiled with lower OpenCL version (1.1) than version_min: > 12. > OCL 1.1 image tests pass on Intel CPU OCL

[Piglit] [PATCH RESEND] cl: Fix image support when built on CL<1.2

2016-03-28 Thread Jan Vesely
Provide our own image_desc structure since it's too tangled to remove. Tests that require OCL 1.2 result in WARN: Piglit was compiled with lower OpenCL version (1.1) than version_min: 12. OCL 1.1 image tests pass on Intel CPU OCL when compiled in 1.1 environment. Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely