Re: [Piglit] [PATCH v2] utils: define DRM_FORMATS needed by dma_buf tests

2016-09-28 Thread Vinson Lee
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Dylan Baker wrote: > Quoting Dylan Baker (2016-09-28 12:09:09) >> If they're not defined by the installed libdrm already. >> >> This moves code already defined in transcode-nv12-as-r8-gr88 to the >> utils level, so that all tests that require

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH v2] utils: define DRM_FORMATS needed by dma_buf tests

2016-09-28 Thread Dylan Baker
Quoting Dylan Baker (2016-09-28 12:09:09) > If they're not defined by the installed libdrm already. > > This moves code already defined in transcode-nv12-as-r8-gr88 to the > utils level, so that all tests that require these formats get them, and also > adds on additional define that wasn't in the

[Piglit] [PATCH v2] utils: define DRM_FORMATS needed by dma_buf tests

2016-09-28 Thread Dylan Baker
If they're not defined by the installed libdrm already. This moves code already defined in transcode-nv12-as-r8-gr88 to the utils level, so that all tests that require these formats get them, and also adds on additional define that wasn't in the mentioned test. bugzilla: