Re: [Piglit] [RFC] glean: remove pixel formats test

2017-07-02 Thread Timothy Arceri
On 30/06/17 23:11, Brian Paul wrote: On 06/29/2017 11:01 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote: On 30/06/17 14:49, Timothy Arceri wrote: In the bug for porting glean tests to piglit this is listed as "covered by Piglit" "Check & Remove". Since that list was made we also now have a public CTS. This is anot

Re: [Piglit] [RFC] glean: remove pixel formats test

2017-06-30 Thread Brian Paul
On 06/29/2017 11:01 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote: On 30/06/17 14:49, Timothy Arceri wrote: In the bug for porting glean tests to piglit this is listed as "covered by Piglit" "Check & Remove". Since that list was made we also now have a public CTS. This is another of the extra slow glean tests. Can

Re: [Piglit] [RFC] glean: remove pixel formats test

2017-06-29 Thread Timothy Arceri
On 30/06/17 14:49, Timothy Arceri wrote: In the bug for porting glean tests to piglit this is listed as "covered by Piglit" "Check & Remove". Since that list was made we also now have a public CTS. This is another of the extra slow glean tests. Can we assume this is all covered and remove? Fo

[Piglit] [RFC] glean: remove pixel formats test

2017-06-29 Thread Timothy Arceri
In the bug for porting glean tests to piglit this is listed as "covered by Piglit" "Check & Remove". Since that list was made we also now have a public CTS. This is another of the extra slow glean tests. Can we assume this is all covered and remove? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6