This change has already landed
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Chad Versace
wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to restore the old piglit behavior or at least come
>>> up with another solution?
>>>
>>
> I second this change. I need to see skipped tests.
>
>
Yes. I'll make that change.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recall this being discussed on the list a few weeks ago, but I can't
> find the email now. There was a recent change to piglit which caused
> tests that were 'Not Run' to be excluded from the 'changes
Hi,
I recall this being discussed on the list a few weeks ago, but I can't
find the email now. There was a recent change to piglit which caused
tests that were 'Not Run' to be excluded from the 'changes' page.
This is a problem for tests with subtests, because if the parent test
crashes, the sub
