On 04/08/17 00:15, Gert Wollny wrote:
Hi Brian,
thanks for the comments.
+u.z = 0.0;
+} while (a <= n);
Does the body of the loop need to be that complicated?
The test must achieve two things: On one hand, at least one component
of a temporary register must be written
Hi Brian,
thanks for the comments.
>
> > +u.z = 0.0;
> > +} while (a <= n);
>
> Does the body of the loop need to be that complicated?
The test must achieve two things: On one hand, at least one component
of a temporary register must be written first at the beginning of the
Hello all,
this is my first message to the list. About the patch below:
Commit message:
"This test verifies whether the optimizer, and here specifically
the register merge step keeps the according register for the whole
loop alife."
I created the test proposing a new register merge algorithm.
