Given the discussion below, I think we'll make piglit a sub-project of
mesa. Those who need commit access to piglit but not mesa can be
added directly to the piglit project.
Hi list.
Since piglit was also moved to the gitlab, same with mesa, our team is
interested in process workflow for
Hi Dan,
Sharing a couple of small ideas.
On 5 June 2018 at 18:02, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> drm-gralloc.git
Empty - please nuke, alongside bugzilla & other infra.
>>> drm.git
Out of curiosity - this and others (say igt) projects are accessible
as mesa/$foo and drm/$foo.
I'd image the same
On Tuesday, 2018-06-05 17:52:17 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 5 June 2018 at 17:49, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 2018-06-05 09:11:58 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >> Given the discussion below, I think we'll make piglit a sub-project of
> >> mesa. Those who need commit
I would say it's a sub-project of Mesa.
Marek
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> All,
>
> Sorry for the mess of GitLab e-mails but there are a lot of questions to
> ask as this process moves forward. Today, we're discussing piglit. I've
> included both the mesa and
