Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] cl: Add test for MUBUF access with a negative vaddr

2018-01-29 Thread Jan Vesely
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 14:43 -0500, Matt Arsenault wrote: > > On Jan 18, 2018, at 15:02, Jan Vesely wrote: > > > > Why is this necessary? can't you just pass the offset argument as a > > kernel input? > > > > Jan > > It needs to specifically be in a VGPR OK LGTM. I'll

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] cl: Add test for MUBUF access with a negative vaddr

2018-01-19 Thread Matt Arsenault
> On Jan 18, 2018, at 15:02, Jan Vesely wrote: > > Why is this necessary? can't you just pass the offset argument as a > kernel input? > > Jan It needs to specifically be in a VGPR___ Piglit mailing list

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] cl: Add test for MUBUF access with a negative vaddr

2018-01-18 Thread Jan Vesely
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 14:20 -0800, Matt Arsenault wrote: > Explanation in test comment. > --- > .../program/execute/amdgcn-mubuf-negative-vaddr.cl | 62 > ++ > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tests/cl/program/execute/amdgcn-mubuf-negative-vaddr.cl > >

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] cl: Add test for MUBUF access with a negative vaddr

2018-01-18 Thread Matt Arsenault
ping > On Dec 15, 2017, at 14:01, Matt Arsenault wrote: > > ping > >> On Nov 28, 2017, at 17:20, Matt Arsenault wrote: >> >> Explanation in test comment. >> --- >> .../program/execute/amdgcn-mubuf-negative-vaddr.cl | 62 >> ++ >> 1

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] cl: Add test for MUBUF access with a negative vaddr

2017-12-15 Thread Matt Arsenault
ping > On Nov 28, 2017, at 17:20, Matt Arsenault wrote: > > Explanation in test comment. > --- > .../program/execute/amdgcn-mubuf-negative-vaddr.cl | 62 ++ > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) > create mode 100644