Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] CMake: Don't turn on dma-buf tests for intel without libdrm >= 2.4.68

2016-09-27 Thread Dylan Baker
Quoting Dylan Baker (2016-09-27 15:14:18) > This version of libdrm was the first to privde DRM_FORMAT_R8, > DRM_FORMAT_GR88 and DRM_FORMAT_RG88, which are needed for dma-buf tests > since commit 0222f5db00fd47fb745402514a6d8cf2747f8434. > > bugzilla:

[Piglit] [PATCH] CMake: Don't turn on dma-buf tests for intel without libdrm >= 2.4.68

2016-09-27 Thread Dylan Baker
This version of libdrm was the first to privde DRM_FORMAT_R8, DRM_FORMAT_GR88 and DRM_FORMAT_RG88, which are needed for dma-buf tests since commit 0222f5db00fd47fb745402514a6d8cf2747f8434. bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 cc: Vinson Lee

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #11 from Dylan Baker --- I think that we just need to update the check on intel, those formats were added in this commit from danvet (268ae7cae5afd76462c3ef14ed9021a2d40c2e57). I'll send a patch. -- You

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #10 from Rob Clark --- (In reply to Dylan Baker from comment #9) > > Err, that should be "if the GBM version is *not* new enough" (In reply to Dylan Baker from comment #8) > > I think the problem is

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #9 from Dylan Baker --- Err, that should be "if the GBM version is *not* new enough" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #7 from Rob Clark --- hmm, well, this hunk was supposed to make it not build that code unless you have 12.1.. although it's possible my cmake-fu was lacking somehow.. --- diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #8 from Dylan Baker --- I think the problem is further down: if(LIBDRM_FOUND AND XCB_DRI2_FOUND AND ((LIBDRM_INTEL_VERSION VERSION_GREATER "2.4.37") OR PIGLIT_HAS_GBM_BO_MAP))

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #6 from Dylan Baker --- Well, we check for a gbm 12.0 (which I think is correct), and for intel_libdrm of some version, which I think is incorrect now. He's building against 11.x, so I would expect it to

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #5 from Rob Clark --- (In reply to Dylan Baker from comment #4) > Vinson, are you testing on Intel hardware? I guess the problem is he is building mesa against an older mesa master, so the test for mesa/gbm

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #4 from Dylan Baker --- Vinson, are you testing on Intel hardware? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #3 from Rob Clark --- (In reply to Vinson Lee from comment #2) > I get the build failure on Ubuntu 16.04 with 11.2.0-1ubuntu2.2. this actually needs a newer mesa, since the R8 and GR88 formats were recent

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #2 from Vinson Lee --- I get the build failure on Ubuntu 16.04 with 11.2.0-1ubuntu2.2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 --- Comment #1 from Dylan Baker --- This commit compiles fine in our CI against mesa master, what driver or version of mesa are you testing against? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] Add profile cts_gl45

2016-09-27 Thread Dylan Baker
Quoting Marek Olšák (2016-09-27 09:48:53) > From: Marek Olšák > > Older versions are broken at the moment and I don't find them useful > anyway. This also creates the test list faster. > --- > tests/cts_gl45.py | 68 > +++

[Piglit] [PATCH] Add profile cts_gl45

2016-09-27 Thread Marek Olšák
From: Marek Olšák Older versions are broken at the moment and I don't find them useful anyway. This also creates the test list faster. --- tests/cts_gl45.py | 68 +++ 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[Piglit] [Bug 97951] New: piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2016-09-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 Bug ID: 97951 Summary: piglit_drm_dma_buf.c:142:7: error: ‘DRM_FORMAT_R8’ undeclared (first use in this function) Product: piglit Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64