Re: pike docker images

Oh nice, I didn’t realize - I live in Vallastaden Linköping Sent from my iPhone > On 14 Feb 2024, at 19:14, Henrik Grubbstr*m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers > forum <10...@lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > >  >> >> Hi. >> >> At Pike Conference 2017 it was decided that we ought to hold a >>

Re: pike docker images

> Hi. > > At Pike Conference 2017 it was decided that we ought to hold a > more informal meeting in Linköping ~ once every quarter. As the > 3 month mark from the latest conference is coming up soon, > it seems time to announce the first such meeting for 2024: > > Pike Meet-up 2024-Q1 >

Re: pike docker images

>> Place: Roxen IS AB >> S:t Larsgatan 22A > > I expect you mean Storgatan 46? Right...

Re: pike docker images

> Place: Roxen IS AB > S:t Larsgatan 22A I expect you mean Storgatan 46?

Re: pike docker images

Hi. At Pike Conference 2017 it was decided that we ought to hold a more informal meeting in Linköping ~ once every quarter. As the 3 month mark from the latest conference is coming up soon, it seems time to announce the first such meeting for 2024: Pike Meet-up 2024-Q1 Date:

Re: pike docker images

Hello, > Ok, I think I have figured this out now. You don't need to modify > buildx itself, but if your docker host is not ppc64 you need to run > this command line first: > > docker run --rm --privileged aptman/qus -s -- -p ppc64 > > Then you can make linux/ppc64 images with buildx (tested

Re: pike docker images

Ok, I think I have figured this out now. You don't need to modify buildx itself, but if your docker host is not ppc64 you need to run this command line first: docker run --rm --privileged aptman/qus -s -- -p ppc64 Then you can make linux/ppc64 images with buildx (tested on arm64). Note that

Re: pike docker images

Jag tror md5sum används i många processer som backup och filöverföring. Jag har redan nämnt Amazon S3.

Re: pike docker images

Hello folks, > On 4 Aug 2022, at 20:41, H William Welliver wrote: > > A quick update: > > I’ve created a new docker organization called “pikelang”, to match the GitHub > organization. I’ve also put a request in to have it made an “OSS” > organization, which I hope will be approved and which

Re: pike docker images

Yup, no problem at all. https://hub.docker.com/r/zeldin/pike/tags

Re: pike docker images

> On 5 Aug 2022, at 16:38, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike > (-) developers forum <10...@lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > >> No luck with linux/ppc64 yet, need to have a closer look. > > I got buildx running, and AFAICT this seems to be an omission in the > moby/buildkit image

Re: pike docker images

>> No luck with linux/ppc64 yet, need to have a closer look. > > I got buildx running, and AFAICT this seems to be an omission in the > moby/buildkit image that buildx is using. > > ppc64 is missing in the lists here: > > https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/master/util/archutil/Dockerfile >

Re: pike docker images

>No luck with linux/ppc64 yet, need to have a closer look. I got buildx running, and AFAICT this seems to be an omission in the moby/buildkit image that buildx is using. ppc64 is missing in the lists here: https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/master/util/archutil/Dockerfile I'll see if I can

Re: pike docker images

New kernel in place. The image does work. --8<-- vanadis:~% uname -a Linux vanadis 5.15.55-gentoo #2 SMP Fri Aug 5 05:35:35 CEST 2022 riscv64 GNU/Linux vanadis:~% docker run -it --rm --user pike bertrandlupart/pike:8.0.1116-unofficial pike Unable to find image

Re: pike docker images

Docker built fine, but it looks like I'm missing some kernel modules (like OVERLAY_FS) needed to start dockerd. I'll get back after I rebuild the kernel...

Re: pike docker images

A quick update: I’ve created a new docker organization called “pikelang”, to match the GitHub organization. I’ve also put a request in to have it made an “OSS” organization, which I hope will be approved and which should allow for a larger number of members (the current limit is 3.) I’ll

Re: pike docker images

I'm trying to build docker on my riscv hardware now. We'll see when/if it completes. :-)

Re: pike docker images

> You can use use base containers I built if you want: > > https://hub.docker.com/r/zeldin/debian/tags > > They are built using debuerreotype, so they should be identical to > Debian built ones. There's also another guy making base containers > for ppc64 and some other arches (including

Re: pike docker images

You can use use base containers I built if you want: https://hub.docker.com/r/zeldin/debian/tags They are built using debuerreotype, so they should be identical to Debian built ones. There's also another guy making base containers for ppc64 and some other arches (including 32-bit ppc):

Re: pike docker images

Debian is offering ppc64le and riscv64 base container images, but not ppc64 : https://hub.docker.com/_/debian I thought ppc64le would fit any 64 bit POWER machine ? Anyhow, I used Debian packages as convenience to get fast results. Many other solutions could

Re: pike docker images

> Btw, pike packages are indeed available for Debian/riscv64: > https://packages.debian.org/sid/pike8.0-core Yeah, just figured that, along with ppc64 and other oddities :) Thanx

Re: pike docker images

>> Looks like your local install is missing the buildx Docker plugin. It’s >> used by the script to build multi-arch container images. >> >> https://docs.docker.com/build/buildx/ > > Well, the documentation you pointed to says > > | Docker Buildx is included in Docker Desktop for Windows,

Re: pike docker images

Btw, pike packages are indeed available for Debian/riscv64: https://packages.debian.org/sid/pike8.0-core

Re: pike docker images

>Looks like your local install is missing the buildx Docker plugin. It’s used >by the script to build multi-arch container images. > >https://docs.docker.com/build/buildx/ Well, the documentation you pointed to says | Docker Buildx is included in Docker Desktop for Windows, macOS, and |

Re: pike docker images

Hello, > Nice. The script does not work for me though: > > mikan:~/docker-pike% env DRYRUN=1 ./build-push.sh docker/8.0.1116 > building docker/8.0.1116 > [+] Building 0.0s (0/0) > error: multiple platforms feature is currently not supported for docker > driver. Please switch to a different