Janos,
Stupid question - is there any reason why this cannot be upgraded to a
64-bit time_t like most modern Unix-based operating systems are already
converting to, so they do not have 2038 problems? This is not a new
issue...
-Arthur
Hello Arthur,
On 2015-11-02 14:49, Arthur Emerson wrote:
Stupid question - is there any reason why this cannot be upgraded to a
64-bit time_t like most modern Unix-based operating systems are already
converting to, so they do not have 2038 problems? This is not a new
issue...
You are right.
Dear piler users,
piler uses a 4 byte value to store the retention timestamp. The trouble
is that
it has 23 more years of support, ie. up to 2038.
Usually it's not a problem, since most people keep emails for 3-10
years. However,
what if you have to store emails for a longer time, eg. to
