I'd be a little surprised if an aquarium heater can maintain 100 degrees
very reliably. In my experience, c-41 developing, especially 35mm, is
tedious, prone to variation in contrast, probably due to variability in
agitation rates, and no fun at all.
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Dilcher
I'd suggest the hat trick!! (substitute the hat with a 8x8" or so piece of dark
cardboard or similar flat material. Place the "hat" in front of the camera,
slide the shutter out, rapidly remove the hat, count your exposure second(s),
place hat rapidly back in front of camera, slide the shutter
Thanks for the responses to my original question.
>From what I have gathered, it appears that c41 is
not too difficult to do. Apparantly, however, you
need to maintain chemicals at 100deg F, throughout
development.
I have a plastic drum (Jobo 3010, I believe) that I
rotate my 4x5 negatives in f
Hi Pinholers:
In case you haven't seen it, the latest edition of View Camera
Magazine features some beautiful pinhole images by Martha
Casanave. The article mentions her web site at:
http://www.marthacasanave.com/
It's worth a look, especially her Coastal Pinholes series.
Another article in
Thanks for everyone who answered my query. As I stated I am having this
problem only on about 1/2 of my images. The ones I expose fast, that is at 1
second are usually no problem, but those at 2 seconds or longer usually have
this problem. Maybe I could take the shutter off and put a piece of bl
>Could anyone tell me how to stop getting the lens cover in the image>
>--__--__--
I was getting my fingers [index, middle and ring] in my negatives. Since I've
been using the new model with the cable release, I have nothing in my images
except my pictures.
How do I go about putting 120 slides
> I had been asking around a month or so ago to people I know about
> doing color processing at home. And all of them warned me of the very
> dangerous chemicals involved. Any tips from those of you who have
> been doing it. I would love to do my color at home like I do my own
> black and white,
--- joebe...@aol.com wrote:
> Could anyone tell me how to stop getting the lens cover in the image. Even
> using short exposures of 1 or 2 seconds with Verichrome 125 film I get about
> half of the 12 images on a roll with part of the lens cover in the photo.
> Wondering if people who have the c
Has anyone experimented with using different shaped holes? I'd be really
interested in seeing examples of
this. Thanks.
Kate
Here is a Zero2000 image I took last summer. No problem
with shutter, as the shutter was basically my thumb (!)
(pardon the long URL...)
http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2001.php?cmd=max&start=&pic=jeff_dilcher__coke_.jpg
I think I took this in Cartersville, GA. on one of my rambles
- Original Message -
From: "R Duarte"
> So, I haven't gotten back my first roll yet so I'm not sure how/if the
> images are going to develop. I'm a little concerned about the exposure
> times... I tried using my light meter but the exposure times came out to
> about 1/8 second in brigh
Is it possible for you people to post an example of an image exhibiting the
mentioned problem?
Guillermo
- Original Message -
From:
> In a message dated 7/16/01 5:31:34 PM Central Daylight Time, joebe...@aol.com
> writes:
>
> << Could anyone tell me how to stop getting the lens cove
In a message dated 7/16/01 5:31:34 PM Central Daylight Time, joebe...@aol.com
writes:
<< Could anyone tell me how to stop getting the lens cover in the image. Even
using short exposures of 1 or 2 seconds with Verichrome 125 film I get about
half of the 12 images on a roll with part of the len
13 matches
Mail list logo
