I owe a debt of gratitude and an apology to Bill, Greg, Guy, John, Gordon,
and Andy! I just went back into the archive and found what I had obviously
missed with respect to what I was looking for when I asked for help with
digital pinholes and scanner pinhole camera setups. It was all there. As
Hi Andy,
I'll get back to you off-list. Yes it could be done over a weekend. The rest
depends on how we structure the workshop, given the type of facilities that you
have.
If you're developing the schedule, I guess this would be a good time to talk.
-:)
Guy
Andy Schmitt wrote:
What would it
In a message dated 11/8/2001 1:50:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
james...@aol.com writes:
You bought a filmless classic. The 127 film was discontinued by Kodak in
the
mid-90s. It took 8 pictures with a negative tha gave a wallet sized contact
print it could also take 12 square pictures
I use TMax 100 4x5 in HC110 dilution B, simply cause I have a bunch left
from some commercial work.
|-Original Message-
|
|Any one use b/w sheet film that uses 'conventional' developer instead of
|paper negatives (other than lith/exotics) ?
|
|If so, what kind? Maybe 4 x 5 film packs?
I've used 4x5,5x7,8x10 without problem. for me the issues were how much
could i influence negative contast since I intended to use the negs for
contact alternative process prints. Tmax is much the easiest to influence
contrast via agitation. don't know anything about xray film. Your task, if
you
I used to work in an X-Ray Darkroom, of course I experimented with the
film. There is an example of the results I got at:
http://www.chucksphotos.com/Gallery_pinhole.html , it's the one labeled
'Coworkers'. I used an Oatmeal box with a pinhole lens and if I remember
correctly about a 20
X-Ray film shows up on EBay at least once a week.cheap too...
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Gordon J.
Holtslander
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:55 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at
Hi:
I remember reading a reference to using x-ray film covered in the pinhole
resource.
It does work with light. I believe x-ray film is more contrasty than
regular film. I think a lower contrast developer is suggested. Selectol
was supposed to work, but its no longer being made.
The cool
I am posting this for the second time because I am new here and may be doing
it wrong, but here goes...
I am thrilled with the discussions that go on here and am delighted with the
information. It is inspiring and motivational - both things I need to get
going again after having been so long
Hello:
Apologies if this question was answered 47 times already before I thought to
ask it.
Any one use b/w sheet film that uses 'conventional' developer instead of
paper negatives (other than lith/exotics) ?
If so, what kind? Maybe 4 x 5 film packs? Anything larger?
Anyone try x-ray film? If
Murray,
You bought a filmless classic. The 127 film was discontinued by Kodak in the
mid-90s. It took 8 pictures with a negative tha gave a wallet sized contact
print it could also take 12 square pictures again the dimensions I do not
recall. It fell out of favor due to the 126 film
The 120 fiilm is a roll film that is 2 1/4 in wide when used in a Twin Lens
Reflex it usually made 12 2 1/4 in pictures on a roll . This film is
paperbacked the length of the entire roll. It could also make 16 pictures on
a roll. The exact size I do not recall but smaller that 2 1/4 in square.
Mac wrote:
Okay Tom,
Now I really need to try this. I think I will just use 4x5 BW. You
have
have already gone over this and I missed it. If i remember you have
two
slits. One a questionmark shap and the other kind of like a 30
degree
bent straw. How wide are the slits? 1-2mm?
Right now I
Hi Guillermo,
I crudely measured several of the dozen or so slits that I use. They
range from about .5mm to .75mm; most are about .65mm. I wasn't sure
how to plug the numbers into the the following formula, since the
slits are different lengths from the film plane. Most always the
inner slit
Hi Brigitte,
Further in Jim Moninger's article he mentioned that he saw the banding
using .5mm slits and so increased the slit width to 2mm thus making
more diffuse images with less banding. I can't see banding in the
images that accompany his article.
The use or elimination of banding is up to
What would it require in terms of facilities chemistry/materials?
Could we do it in a weekend? (2 or 3 day)
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Guy Glorieux
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 7:32
Guy...let me know when you are doing a workshop in Montreal..thanks, Renee
It would be here in Montreal.
The tough part is to get appropriate facilities for several people to work at
the
same time. The rest is really easy.
If you have any suggestions for doing a workshop in your part of the world, I'd
be happy to get there. Seems that we are not too far away.
Isn't
In a message dated 11/7/01 9:07:19 PM, guy.glori...@sympatico.ca writes:
Actually, it was a good piece for me as well, because I plan to organize a
workshop on the subject some time in the future.
Do you have any idea where you'll be teaching the workshop?
leezy
Her work is beautiful how do you think she did it? A really Large box/and
curved film?? I am embarrased to ask. But I will anyway
WendyG
In a message dated 11/7/01 8:07:43 PM, zin...@telenet.net writes:
leezy, I know what you mean!
all my energy is going to students teachers right now,
hang in there...
jim k
I'm hanging
and
still love the paint can.
Thank you again for it.
leezy
In a message dated 11/7/01 11:25:15 PM, m.w.kel...@verizon.net writes:
+ADw-g+AD4-
What is this?
A very funny thing just happened. I was surfing some of the Barbara Ess URLs
that Mike Keller suggested. While in the Bard site, I found the faculty names
and one of them was Rena Stolove, a
22 matches
Mail list logo
