See, I just knew that the twice-or-three-times-as-expensive Epsons would be
suggested! Not that you're wrong about them, just that I am "resource
challenged" at present... (What about Canonscan scanners? Anyone use 'em?)
While pondering flatbed scanners that will also do 35mm transparencies, I
ha
Greetings,
I have also considered piezography, however it is questionable whether it would
work with my epson 875dc. My prints are generally quite smallish, no bigger
than 6x9 and I have great results with the epson ink sets. There are plenty of
users who find fault with the Epson 870/1270 i
on 21/3/02 2:48 pm, Steve Bell at veracity...@earthlink.net wrote:
> http://www.virtualtraveller.org/epson2450.htm Check out this link. it has a
> nice review and isn't related to the company.
>
> Steve
>
Thanks for the link; I've bookmarked it and found out a particularly
interesting tip on sca
http://www.virtualtraveller.org/epson2450.htm Check out this link. it has a
nice review and isn't related to the company.
Steve
> [Original Message]
> From: ragowaring
> To:
> Date: 3/21/2002 6:51:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Epson Perfection 1250 Photo
FlatbedScanner
>
> I am th
- Original Message -
From: "Derek Clarke"
> TBH these dual-use flatbeds are still better for opaque material than
> transparency use, especially 35mm.
>
> So they are still inferior to a true film scanner at the same scan resolution.
>
> Also the transparency illuminator is usually limit
TBH these dual-use flatbeds are still better for opaque material than
transparency use, especially 35mm.
They all use sensor elements at the moment that have about half the claimed
optical resolution, and use half-steps and image processing to make up the
difference.
So they are still inferio
This seems like an opportune time for a variation on the scaner topic. I
have negative scanners but my flatbed scanner is older and not too adequate.
Any advice on choice of flatbed scanner for prints, not negs?
Are these good scanners for opaque material or are they just attractive
because they offer the opportunity to scan negatives?
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Epson Perfection 1250 Photo Flatbed
Scanner
> In a messa
I am thinking of getting an Epson Perfection 2450.
Although more expensive, it does give greater possibilities particularly
regarding negatives and slides. With the its resolution you can enlarge
four times without loosing detail. This is a very big plus, particularly
with 4x5 film where the prin
In a message dated 3/20/02 11:35:35 PM Central Standard Time,
pinholeren...@netscape.net writes:
<< the epson 2450 is a great scanner costing around $375.00 . It has 35mm
,120mm & 4x5 capabilities . several photo magazines have given it rave
revues . If you can save up for it you will not be
the epson 2450 is a great scanner costing around $375.00 . It has 35mm
,120mm & 4x5 capabilities . several photo magazines have given it rave
revues . If you can save up for it you will not be disappointed . I feel
it is a very good value for your money .
chip renner
michael_georg...@trendmicr
11 matches
Mail list logo
