Re: [pinhole-discussion] paper negative tricks

2002-04-14 Thread Tim Rawling
Hi Mike, A few years ago I made a camera out of an old 8x10 cibachrome developing tank that I had. I sealed the pinhole with a red glass filter and developed the images in the camera. The other cool thing about having a sealed pinhole camera is that you can fill the camera with water

[pinhole-discussion] Film Development

2002-04-14 Thread Ian McKee
Richard, I have to correct you; 1 roll of 36 mm x 36 is exactly equal to 1 sheet of 8x 10 - 80 square inches. Check Kodak developer tech bulletins. Ian McKee One 8x10 neg has way more surface area than 2 rolls of 135x36. 3 to 4 oz of dilute developer is a bargain. Nobody does 8x10 for the

Re: [pinhole-discussion] my first photo

2002-04-14 Thread Jeff Dilcher
Good job! What kind of camera are you using, and what kind of focal length? I have always shot film, but would like to experiment with paper. What did you mean by Gimp curves? changing contrast? I have found that this is almost always necessary with my pinhole film scans, and even my digital

Re: [pinhole-discussion] paper neg.

2002-04-14 Thread ragowaring
I you want clouds and use paper negatives the answer is simple Use a multigrade paper and place a 0 multigrade filter or other colour equivalent behind the pinhole. This will reduce contrast to the point where you get skies and a more continual tonal range. The only drawback is that the

RE: [pinhole-discussion] BTZS tubes; fixing

2002-04-14 Thread Andy Schmitt
or... just fix it for 1/2 the time in the tube then dump it into a fixer tray. TMax, especially, has an indicator built into it (the infamous purple) that indicates incomplete fixing so you want to be careful removing the coloration w/ HCA to pull it out. andy -Original Message- From:

[pinhole-discussion] paper neg.

2002-04-14 Thread a
Paper negatives have different qualities than film and shooting cloudes is definitely not among them. Paper negatives gives me the opportunity to deal with time/light modelling the subjekt. The sun is moving, remember? Exposure-time from 1 - 30 hours makes me think and act differently compared

Re: [pinhole-discussion] paper negative tricks

2002-04-14 Thread Richard M. Koolish
I finally got my wooden 4x5 camera lightproof and taken few test shots using paper negatives. Results are fine, but some recent talk here (esp. diluting developer) made me search for methods for better tonality. Flashing (ie. pre-exposure) was one I've already tried, but these tests showed

[pinhole-discussion] going to use film

2002-04-14 Thread Matti Koskinen
thanks all for your information. Building a developing tube seems quite easy and cheap compared to ready tubes. I've taken 6x6 film pinhole photos with my modified Holga and the tonal range is much better than the paper negatives. But now as it looks like I may be able to develop sheet film

Re: [pinhole-discussion] paper negative tricks

2002-04-14 Thread mbeacom
G.Penate wrote: - Original Message - From: Andy Schmitt aschm...@warwick.net or build a developing tube or 2..then you just load roll...sort of.. 8o) andy That's another possibility. Here is a link to a design I have read is effective: