beautiful image. thanks for posting it
hey David I thought the same thing -that it could be a pinhole photo when I
saw the album cover. Looks like Bruce is standing in front of Convention
Hall in Asbury Park, NJ. Guess we'll have to wait till the release date to
check the credits to know for sure!
I've been photographing Asbury
Shannon,
Numerically, an EI of 1000 may seem as a big jump from ISO-400,
but it is really just 1 1/3 stops faster, which probably can be accounted by a
combination of factors like: how thin you want the negatives low zones to be,
a bit of anomalies in the reciprocity correction (I
Very curious also.
Jeff
shannonsto...@earthlink.net wrote:
I like this a lot too. I assume when you say Lith print, you mean you made
a lith negative to print it? What kind of print is it?
--shannon
I have been testing with HP5+ film to see what film speed to shoot it at.
To my surprise, it seems as if its speed in my pinhole camera is about 1000!
It's rated at 400. The way I figure exposures is based on the fact that my
pinhole is f352. That's supposed to be 30 times whatever f64 is. So
I like this a lot too. I assume when you say Lith print, you mean you made
a lith negative to print it? What kind of print is it?
--shannon
--
From: Andy Schmitt aschm...@warwick.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] [pinhole discussion] New Lith
As requested I am finally getting around to posting some gum bichromate
versions of my pinhole images. As frustrating as gums are to master, I
think the marriage of the two methods can meld together to give you some
beautiful results. The original posts to the gallery were scans of
polaroid
