That is a beautiful little print.
The color reminds me of the old Ilford Lith paper. Is this on Ilford or
Sterling Lith Paper?
Jim
> http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=chri
> sharkness
> .jpg
The message came to me as above. Fortunately, I knew to paste it together so
that I could appreciate the image.
There is a good way to distribute long URLs so that they won't break up. One
option is to go to http
I've had a couple of my pinhole images put on CDs, specifically, Studies #1 and
#2 on http://mywebpages.comcast.net/hmpi/Pinhole/Images/PinholeImages.htm.
Nothing big deal, as they were small groups just starting out. However, it is
a kick when you see your work distributed as such.
Cheers -
ge
--- Jeffery Atkins wrote:
> As requested I am finally getting around to posting some gum bichromate
> versions of my pinhole images. As frustrating as gums are to master, I
> think the marriage of the two methods can meld together to give you some
> beautiful results. The original posts to the
Thanks for all of your responses to the print I posted. Thanks leezy! For
those curious about lith printing, I refer you to Tim Rudman's book:
"The Master Photographer's Lith Printing Course' & his web site:
http://www.silverprint.co.uk/whatis.html
My photo was shot on Neopan 1600 and printed
These images are very, very beautiful.
Gum (most alternative processes) are a natural for film pinhole.
But you have enlarged the negatives.
Would you share with us which negative enlarging process you used?
Thank you.
leezy
Hi. I've been playing around with pinhole photography, and I'm still in the
mode of figuring it all out.
Recently, I decided to change the focal length from 110mm to about 35mm. I
have an old Agfa Bily, and just removed the entire front end except for the
'accordian' part, the pinhole lines up wit
