- Original Message -
From: "Uptown Gallery"
> If one set up a 4x5 bellows camera for pinhole with an appropriate pinhole
> for double extension (say 300 mm), placed the bellows at 300 mm but used a 4
> x 5 filmholder, would that place the worst of the edge falloff outside the
> 4x5 image?
At 300mm, fall off would be way outside a 4x5 negative. I use 125mm
cameras with no noticable fall off. Pretty long focal length at 300mm
though and lng exposures.
Nick
On Thursday, April 10, 2003, at 07:32 PM, Uptown Gallery wrote:
Hello:
If one set up a 4x5 bellows camera for pinho
Nice and informative article. The mathematical formulae look a little scary,
but I'm sure I could figure it out. I don't, unfortunately, have access to a
flatbed scanner, I only have the other kind.
Very nice article. I'm tucking this away for future reference. Most everyone
in class did eit
Shelley,
Pinhole photography is in technical aspects not different than glass lens
photography. Focal length, aperture (not aperture size), exposure, angle of
view, light fall off at the edges of film, reciprocity corrections, etc., are
all concepts that function the same whether the lens is a pi
Warning: >>NEWBIE QUESTIONS<<
Hello, I'm currently a student at a local community college where we are
building (in photo 102, strangely enough) pinhole cameras.
My teacher, for some reason, didn't see fit to tell us anything about pinhole
photography except 'trial and error', repeated ad naus
