--- Uptown Gallery wrote:
> Hello:
>
> If one did MF (4x5 or 5x7) or LF (8x10) sheet film pinhole (and had an
> enlarger large enough), what are the prospects for enlarging?
>
> I was very unhappy with 4x6 prints from 35mm pinhole.
Everything depends upon what you are trying to accomplish. I w
- Original Message -
From:
> The issue is the degree of enlargement. Enlarging 35mm to 4x6 increases
the
> image area 16 times. Increasing a 4x5 to 16x20 increases the area only 4
> times.
4x5 to 16x20 is also a 16X increase in area.
You are right, the issue is the degree of enlargement
Murray,
I all depends on your own taste and sensibility. I have made mural size
prints from 35mm pinhole negatives and been very happy with them. I
routinely make 11x14 prints from my 35mm negs and the 6x6 negs from my Zero
2000 pinhole camera. When I had access to a 4x5 enlarger I made 11x
"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole & enlarging
> Hello:
>
> If one did MF (4x5 or 5x7) or LF (8x10) sheet film pinhole (and had an
> enlarger large enough), what are the prospects for enlarging?
>
> I was very unhappy w
- Original Message -
From: "Uptown Gallery"
>
> If one did MF (4x5 or 5x7) or LF (8x10) sheet film pinhole (and had an
> enlarger large enough), what are the prospects for enlarging?
Murray,
4x5 & 5x7 were also LF last time a checked.
> I was very unhappy with 4x6 prints from 35mm pinho
Hello:
If one did MF (4x5 or 5x7) or LF (8x10) sheet film pinhole (and had an
enlarger large enough), what are the prospects for enlarging?
I was very unhappy with 4x6 prints from 35mm pinhole.
Thanks
Murray
