-- Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Dilcher"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:59 PM
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] RE: [Followup] airline screening and
> film
>
>
>> Building a camera onsite is not an option for me, and FEDEXING my
> film
>> b
Jeff Dilcher wrote:
> >From my research since I first posted, I have determined that
>
> a) you are likely to get zapped by much higher powered devices
> if your film is in bags which are "checked" and not carried on board.
>
> b) 100asa and under film *should* be able to withstand several exposur
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Dilcher"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:59 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] RE: [Followup] airline screening and
film
> Building a camera onsite is not an option for me, and FEDEXING my
film
> back and forth will be difficult since I d
>From my research since I first posted, I have determined that
a) you are likely to get zapped by much higher powered devices
if your film is in bags which are "checked" and not carried on board.
b) 100asa and under film *should* be able to withstand several exposures
to walkthrough devices.
c)
