Re: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-22 Thread Chris Peregoy
I would think that from the original question, that the user was using his studio strobes on light stands. He did mention that they were Speedatron Brownline. For the member with the one pop per stop to get his exposure right (considering the laws of physics) he would have to move his light in a

[pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-22 Thread memo marciano
Hello there, This discussion's been a good test for the tolerant spirit that prevails in this list. Reading the archives I can see that there have been some controversies in the past, but they have been more about shape than substance. In this case, is different, is about a technical

Re: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-21 Thread William Erickson
exposure. - Original Message - From: John Yeo jonn...@thegrid.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:21 PM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography Why would reciprocity failure even be a problem? It occurs when

Re: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-21 Thread Levi Brown
. Levi On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:14:34 -0800 Tom Ferguson tomf2...@pipeline.com writes: From: Levi Brown kerpl...@juno.com Subject: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography Andrew, I've been doing this for several years now... here is what you do. First

RE: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-20 Thread Michael Keller
Because reciprocity failure comes about in accumulated exposure. 100 pops of a flash is accumulated exposure in the same way that 100 seconds of continuous exposure is. My experience is that you need to account for some reciprocity failure. |-Original Message- | | | |Why would reciprocity

RE: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-20 Thread Michael Keller
|-Original Message- | | Ideally if you can get your meter to read F-45 you are doing good. This | whole bit about doubling your number of flashes to add an extra stop is | nonsense. Everytime that you flash the strobes you add an extra stop of | light. Lets say that I set up my lights

Re: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-20 Thread John Yeo
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography From: Levi Brown kerpl...@juno.com Subject: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography Andrew, I've been doing this for several years now... here is what you do. First determine the effective aperture

Re: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-20 Thread Tom Ferguson
From: Levi Brown kerpl...@juno.com Subject: [pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography Andrew, I've been doing this for several years now... here is what you do. First determine the effective aperture of your camera. For my 4x5 mine is about F-256 and for my converted

[pinhole-discussion] READ THIS ONE- Studio Photography

2000-11-20 Thread Levi Brown
Andrew, I've been doing this for several years now... here is what you do. First determine the effective aperture of your camera. For my 4x5 mine is about F-256 and for my converted Hasselblad it is about F-140. Get yourself a flash meter and get your strobes close to your subject. Ideally